it depends how big the sticks are

It was actually 54 inches and 44 pounds.

So when the story is told, the fish was 107" long and 300 lbs. lol

Yea, no shit. He doesn't even need to lie with that monster.

Red Green: [singing] Oh, they're weighin' the fish at the fish weigh-in, down at Mercury Creek / The prize is a boat and a bucket of bugs for the biggest fish of the week / I caught me a nice little sunfish, it's gonna make me a winner / Not from the size of the fish itself, but the ball bearings I fed it for dinner.

I love that show.

did you catch this?

No, my step dad and a few of his friends did. It was caught in Rainy Lake in Minnesota

but its still just not a random internets picture

It probally will be now though. lol

What an awesome fish. Let's go Musky fishing!

Let's go, I have three weeks of leave that I have to use by October 1st...

Where's Rainy lake? is that up by the border? Seems like a fish you'd pull out of Lake of the woods.

It's up by International falls, so yea it's pretty close to the border. We'll have to organize a time when I come home on leave and go to Canada fishing.

Trout has nothing on a good Northern Pike.

TRUE...VERY TRUE,BUT I STILL LOVE MY TROUT & WALLEYE

Walleye is still my personal favorite!

No such thing as a good Pike... its like biting into a cactus with all the opposing bones... and that size?? the bones ought to be well developed indeed.

I geuss that is a matter of opinion. Since trout is terrible, and northern is good but boney.